Start with the reason
Read the rejection notice and identify which part of the character owns the problem:
Change the cause, not only the visible symptom. Renaming an IP character while keeping the same world and storyline does not make the work original.
Make a meaningful revision
- Save a copy of the current version.
- Edit the field named or implied by the rejection.
- Search every other field for the same issue.
- Regenerate the profile image when the rejection involved visual cues.
- Test the revised character privately.
- Resubmit only when the reason has been addressed.
Subjective review
Overall quality includes judgement. Two reviewers can weigh originality, writing, visual quality, or versatility differently. Previously approved content can also be reviewed against the current policy when it is edited, resubmitted, or reported. The best response is to make the submission’s quality and compliance easier to see:- Clarify the public promise.
- Strengthen the greeting hook.
- Remove generic or repetitive writing.
- Make consent and adulthood unambiguous.
- Make the visual identity more distinctive.
- Remove details that do not support the experience.
When to appeal
Appeal when you believe the rule was applied incorrectly, not when you simply dislike a documented rule. Include:- Character name or share link.
- Exact rejection reason.
- The specific reason you believe it does not apply.
- Any change or context the reviewer should examine.